Score Card

Judging and Scoring Criteria

Judging and Scoring Criteria

The PRmoment judges are chosen because of their professional and wide-ranging level of expertise. Judges will be split into panels and 3 judges will read and pre-score each entry form, considering any supporting materials submitted. Judges' pre-scores will be combined, and the highest-scoring entries will determine the shortlists. Any judge who has a potential conflict of interest will not be allowed to judge that entry.

Winners will be announced live at an online awards evening on April 6th, with the communication fraternity attending, after the jury meeting on 13th March 2026.

Criteria & Guidance

Entries will be scored against the criteria detailed below out of a suggested total score. Please use the ‘Guidance on Scoring’ table. These are the criteria that can be used to score and judge your entries. This will ensure maximum consistency and fairness to entrants.

Criteria – 30 under 30

Please look for an individual who can demonstrate a bright and promising young communicator who is delivering best practices while showing a creative and innovative approach to communications using digital and data with an eye to business impact. The nominee must be 30 years old or under on 15.04.2026.

Please consider the structure, presentation, and clarity of each entry. Entries should focus on the recent work of individuals (in the last two years).

Criteria – 30 under 30

Criteria 1 – Strategic Creativity & Integration

1 to 5 Points

  • Generic: Is the idea standard or derivative? Does it rely heavily on a single channel (e.g., just a press release) with no clear creative hook.
  • Solid: Does it have a clear creative concept that is executed well across multiple channels? Is it groundbreaking?
  • Distinguished: Is it a "Big Idea" that cuts through the noise? Demonstrates true integration (Paid, Earned, Shared, Owned) and offers a fresh, unexpected approach that is also highly feasible?

Criteria 2 – Core Competencies & Stakeholder Management

1 to 5 Points

Tactical: Does it demonstrate basic execution (writing, pitching) but lacks understanding of the wider business context or C-suite needs.

Proficient: Does it have strong engagement with media and internal stakeholders? Content is high-quality multimedia. Demonstrates a clear grasp of the client’s business goals.

Mastery: Does it seamlessly blend media relations with business strategy? Is there evidence of high-level C-suite advisory, crisis mitigation, and sophisticated multimedia storytelling?

Criteria 3 – Leadership and pushing the envelope

1 to 5 Points

Passive: The entrant followed a brief but did not challenge assumptions or innovate processes.

Active Leader: Managed client expectations well and led the team effectively. Took calculated risks to improve campaign performance.

Visionary: Redefined the standard for the client or agency. Showed courage in challenging the status quo, or pivoting strategy in real-time to achieve success.

Criteria 4 – Innovation: Identify 2 to 3 critical ways in which traditional PR no longer serves the modern newsroom (e.g., social first, speed, access to data, visual assets). Then, develop a mock PR campaign that solves these specific pain points to secure top-tier coverage."

  • Understanding of the Brief ( See question 3 in the section B for the detailed brief)
  • Objectives
  • Does the campaign focus on the brief?

1 to 5 Points

This section will count separately towards the overall score and will play a role in case of a tie.

Criteria 5 – Measurable Impact

1 to 5 Points

  • Vanity Metrics: Relies solely on "Reach," "Impressions," or "AVE" (Advertising Value Equivalency). No evidence of real engagement.
  • Outcomes: Demonstrates clear audience engagement, share of voice, and message pull-through.
  • Business Impact: Connects PR activity to behavioural change or business results (e.g., leads generated, stock price stability, policy change, reputation sentiment shift).

This will give a total score for each entry out of a possible 25.


Guidance on Scoring

Score

Description

5

Outstanding – Fully meets, and even exceeds, the criteria

4-5

Impressive – Meets the criteria and is worthy of recognition

3-4

Good - Meets the criteria but perhaps not so exceptional

2-3

OK - Nothing special or impressive

1-2

Weak - Unimpressive